Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zephyr Teachout


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:08, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Zephyr Teachout

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:PROF; only sources are an op-ed, an interview, and her faculty profile.

(While not a reason for deletion, the subject appears to have previously ) L Faraone  18:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. This "immensely talented and creative scholar" (according to her web page) has not acquired enough GS citations to pass WP:Prof. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC).

I came to this wikipedia page because I saw this person in the news regarding a supreme court case, and in a non-public mailing list discussion. This entry was helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.20.88.72 (talk) 17:53, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Short of academic impact for sure. The rest of her activities does not pass WP:GEN in my reading.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.