Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero-emission rocket propulsion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Zero-emission rocket propulsion

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to be original research. I can't find any relevant Google results for this. One of the external links is to a password-protected forum, while the other is to a page that doesn't mention the topic at all. --Carnildo (talk) 09:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR. Ipsign (talk) 09:18, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * And also per WP:NEO (agreeing with Andy Dingley on WP:NEO below) Ipsign (talk) 11:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * delete The article's creator was user:KVDP. It's thus no surprise to find a nonsense article where some random discipline has had "green" technologies stuck arbitrarily to it.
 * There is scope for a good article here, on the emissions of rockets, on the "benign emissions" of cryogenic hydrogenic etc. rockets and also on the use of emissionless thrusters in space. All three of these are real techniques of notable interest, and especially the first two, of clear relation between them. However this is not that article.
 * This article's title is also pure WP:NEO. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete rockets are pure reaction engines. Reaction engines emit a fluid to produce thrust, in an action-reaction, so it is impossible to create a "rocket" that doesn't emit something, it would not be a rocket if it didn't emit something. 70.24.251.71 (talk) 09:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.