Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero-ground


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) v/r - TP 17:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Zero-ground

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Proprietry product lacking notability: no significant coverage, no reliable sources. Only one non-trivial, secondary source is provided that refers to Zero-Ground:, whereas the others are press releases or primary sources. Zero-Ground LLC, the actual company, also appears non-notable. Meph talk 16:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  —  Meph talk 16:07, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: This article has been re-named Shaft-Voltage and deletion has been contested at Talk:Shaft-Voltage. Biscuittin (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I have done some tidying up and hidden the "advertising" part of the article. I think the article should now be kept. Biscuittin (talk) 22:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Biscuittin. I read it over, and it seems to be not-advert-ish. -- Σ ☭ ★  00:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * WP:NOTGUIDE: In response to the above, I don't think promotional content is the issue currently. In its present state, I would suggest that the entire 'Solution' section is misconstrued: it's content appropriate for a research paper, which is exactly what it derives from, according to the author. It is instructing readers how to fix something, e.g. with insulation, and too closely resembles a guide: WP:NOTGUIDE. The author states:


 * 'Now I believe this page is, unequivocally notable & a necessary edition, for anyone installing VFD's or having grounding issues.' (my emphasis)


 * If so, the lede-in section would be all that's left. There's little to justify a separate article, distinct from variable-frequency drive, especially since by its very nature it's a derivative topic. Another option is to merge it with the VFD article. Meph talk 04:01, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I have modified the text to remove the "how to" content and linked it as a main article from Variable-frequency_drive. Biscuittin (talk) 15:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep this is a legitimate topic and the article seems to have plenty of reliable sources. Wizard191 (talk) 21:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.