Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America1000 11:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability concerns. Only references are to a bookseller and a user review site owned by the same bookseller. SpinningSpark 11:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The following sources seem to be sufficient to establish that this book meets WP:NBOOK:     Everymorning   talk  11:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  11:57, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  11:57, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Additional information and reputable references have been added to support the notability. Many incoming and outcoming wikilinks.

Lamro (talk) 12:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep It needs more than a quoted review longer than the article's original prose, but this book was widely reviewed, as Everymorning's links show, and is clearly notable. See also, , Interesting to see the contrast between the negative professional reviews and the positive popular ones.  Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:02, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * In view of the sources presented, I withdraw my nomination and call for speedy keep. SpinningSpark 13:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.