Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero Dark Thirty (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Zero Dark Thirty (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page does not link to any other articles with the name "Zero Dark Thirty", since there is only one page with this title, there is no need for a disambiguation page. Camyoung54  talk  22:42, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree this seems inappropriate nonsense  ferret  23:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Not the purpose of a disambig page. Also seems like a way to get some cheap publicity for the albums. Kitfoxxe (talk) 02:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete The disambiguation page is unnecessary. The Giant Purple Platypus (talk) 09:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Disambiguation pages disambiguate Wikipedia topics (not just Wikipedia articles). Kitfoxxe's assumption of bad faith aside, the disambiguation page is necessary for readers seeking the album or song (how do you propose that such a reader find it after landing at Zero Dark Thirty?). Please read MOS:DABMENTION. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The album and song on the page are just briefly mentioned on the article this disambiguation page is directing them to. Mike McClure has multiple studio albums, however not all of them are included on disambiguation pages as well as the song from Skelethon is just one song from one album. If the person searching for these typed in "Zero Dark Thirty" and the name of the artist, they could easily find them with no help from this disambiguation page. Camyoung54   talk  14:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * See MOS:DABMENTION. There are three topics, covered by articles on Wikipedia, that could be expected to exist under the article title "Zero Dark Thirty". One of the problems with your solution is the reader may not know the name of the artist. "However not all of them are mentioned...": see WP:OTHERSTUFF, and feel free to add them to the appropriate disambiguation pages per MOS:DABMENTION. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per JHJ - just a well-formed and useful dab page. Pam  D  15:02, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Serves the purpose of a disambiguation page in guiding users to information about those topics. I doubt there's a significant number of users seeking information about these topics; nevertheless I don't see any reason to delete a disambiguation page that complies with our guidelines. Theoldsparkle (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. In conformance with disambiguation guidelines, and potentially useful to someone searching for any meaning other than the film. bd2412  T 13:45, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 6 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per MOS:DABMENTION, no harm here J04n(talk page) 12:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep It provides some utility and is consistent with the style manual (DABMENTION). - MrX 03:28, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep this disambiguation page is perfectly fine, multiple usages of the term exist and this informs readers.  NYSM y talk page  23:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.