Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeta Energy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Zeta Energy

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP. References are blogs, mentions and even WP:FORBESCON. A WP:BEFORE search found the same along with a ton of press releases. CNMall41 (talk) 06:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology,  and Texas. CNMall41 (talk) 06:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I was not done creating the page when I published it in order to be able to attach a graphic. Sorry about that. I am still adding the cites and links to it. Modwiki (talk) 20:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comment. Is there additional information to wanted to add to the page to show notability? Do you feel it is a notable company and if so what references per WP:THREE would say count towards WP:ORGCRIT?--CNMall41 (talk) 18:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Here are my observations:
 * 1. There is a case on Zeta Energy in Strategic Management: Theory and Cases, one of the world's most widely used strategy textbooks and used in thousands of business schools around the world.
 * 2. CleanTechnica, which published an interview with Zeta Energy's management, is a top rated news source for clean tech news, and is rated "generally trustworthy" and "High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record" by MediaBiasFactCheck.com.
 * 3. Zeta Energy won a $4 million dollar award from the U.S. Department of Energy ARPA-E program, and news of this award was widely reported, including on ABC13 Eyewitness News and several Houston newspapers.
 * 4. Sandy Munro, the auto industry's most famous tear-down analyst did a one-hour segment on Zeta Energy for his show, Munro Live, which has over 387,000 subscribers. He is famously unbiased and became the leading source for cost breakdown info for Tesla vehicles and other EVs. This was the source of his interest in Zeta Energy because Zeta Energy makes batteries that are expected to change the cost structure of EVs. The episode got 271,000 views. Modwiki (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  07:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: I'd like to see an evaluation of the sources brought into the discussion. Also, there is an unbolded Keep here so Soft Deletion is not an option. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Support nom, scarce sources BoraVoro (talk) 15:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak Delete references [2-8] seem to be trade publications.
 * Reference [11] is unable to be accessed or assessed.
 * Reference [14] is trivial coverage that reads like a press release and provides no original or independent analysis or coverage of significance. It is routine reporting of capital raised. Think this clearly fails WP:CORPDEPTH other sources seem to be primary or unreliable, such as reference [9] which is a YouTube video. Delete or draft
 * Cray04 (talk) 08:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Lithium–sulfur battery where the company is currently mentioned, as WP:ATD. &mdash;siro&chi;o
 * Delete Unable to find any references that meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 18:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.