Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeuxilogy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  20:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

life is a pumpkin

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable and original research. A page is created by an IP address who’s only edits were in creating this article. The only source is a single website probably run by the author of this article. Only 317 Google hits mostly Wikipedia mirrors. S.dedalus (talk) 23:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. --S.dedalus (talk) 23:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds interesting, but it doesn't look like it is interesting enough for a third party to write about it. A quick search reveals a google bomb. -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 00:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - couldn't find any published reliable sources. Article is just used as an avenue to host link for his own research. Fails WP:NOR.  Sting_au   Talk  03:13, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no independent sources available, appears to be OR. Maralia (talk) 05:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR, above. Bearian (talk) 16:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable. Kudos to the article creator though, in using incredibly big words and musical jargon to confuse me into thinking it was, in fact, important.  But it's not.   Keeper   |   76  20:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was thinking of keeping a small chunk of the article on a user subpage just because of the unusually talented academia-cruft writing. I’m still not sure what all this means. . . --S.dedalus (talk) 22:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.