Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhang Haijie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 10:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Zhang Haijie
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete This article is a hoax, a nonsense as well as outrageous, inappropriate and offensive and unconstructive. Youmaynotknowme (talk) 19:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC) — Youmaynotknowme (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

I have read the "Deletion Policy" and fully understood the content. And my decision to delete the page is in accordance with the terms specified in the Policy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons

I have also read the "Guide To Deletion" and fully understood the content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youmaynotknowme (talk • contribs) 09:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I tried to delete the page for a few good reasons:


 * The creater of the page has obviously vandalized it by giving informations, strongly believed to be false, incorrect and/or inaccurate.


 * The creator of the page has given out someone else's private information without getting the permission from the affected person, hence, violating the rights to that person's personal privacy.


 * This is completely nonsense, meaningless, unconstructive and outrageous.


 * Obviously, I have tried the "db delete because" function as explained in the help section but does not work.


 * Here are just some of the hyperlinks to the help section where you can find advices for user who finds article inappropriate, offensive and also, MOST IMPORTANTLY, violating the "comunally agreed policies and guidelines."

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_administrator_intervention_against_vandalism

2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us/Article_problem/Vandalism

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us/Article_problem/Factual_error

4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_discussions

Please take your time to consider these facts seriously and grant my request to delete the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhang_Haijie for good.

If you were to take a look at the "History" section at the top of the page, you will also find others' opinions, concerns and debates contributed by other members of the public about removing and deleting the page.

Please note that many people including myself sees this as an etiquette problem.  Speedy Delete  Please note that "Notability" is only ONE OF THE GUIDELINE to create a good article. Furthermore, I DO NOT SEE that this article has conform with the "Notability" guideline. Our main discussion here is about DELETING this article and I think it is only correct if we pay our attention on whether or not this article has indeed violated the criteria for "Deletion", as specified in the "Deletion Policy". In this discussion, we have to be relevant to be on the track, NOT off the track. I strongly urge commentators to read the "Notability Guideline" properly before providing their opinions on this issue. By carefully reading and understanding it will help you to provide a reasonable point of view on this discussion. Please not that Wikipedia's "Guideline and Policy" is a general suggestion to users to make proper use of it, not to misuse it. It is also NOT above the Law. Any found guilty of violating the Law can face legal consequences. Please read this carefully again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons.Youmaynotknowme (talk) 09:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This presenter certainly seems notable by wikipedia standards, being the anchor on a news program and winning a few awards to boot. I don't see which parts of the article are causing concern, perhaps the nominator would like to point these out? Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - While this person seems notable per WP:BIO (won an award), I'm not finding many reliable sources (I'm not sure if this ref is reliable). Are there are non-English refs that I'm not finding? The nominator should also read WP:BEFORE, as AfD is for articles that do not meet Wikipedia's notability policy. This is not the place to deal with editing/content issues. PDCook (talk) 22:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep As individual is not a hoax and the award and award nominations appear to meet WP:ANYBIO . Translating these from Chinese language could be further helpful.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Be careful what you say regarding legal action, and please review the WP:Legal threats policy. I'm pretty sure everyone here is familiar with the notability policy. I question if you understand it fully. Can you provide us with the language in the policies that you believe this article violates? If she is an anchor of a major news program and has won awards, it seems pretty clear she meets the notability policy per WP:BIO. Your nebulous claims of "hoax" and "nonsense", and your links to policies aren't going to get this article deleted. You need to explain explicitly what policies this article violates, and why that warrants deletion. Also, you only get to !vote once, and I've struck out your second vote. PDCook (talk) 12:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I can't see anything in the article that looks libellous or defamatory. I also can't see much in the way of sourcing that's accessible. I am puzzled as to the vehemence of the attack on the article's existence and as to why it is described as a hoax. Some better info might help to explain that. I can't really see either how the creator of an article can be said to vandalise it. I note that the creator of the article has edited many different pages, but that Youmaynotknowme appears to be a single purpose account. Peridon (talk) 14:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Going for a Keep as convincing evidence for deletion hasn't appeared. Come to that, I don't thing that any evidence for deletion has appeared... It seems to be just allegations and 'original research' - or possible personal prejudice of some kind. "Please note that many people including myself sees this as an etiquette problem"? Where are they? We often get a flock of socks and SPAs in AfD. Unusually, we only appear to have the nominator here, both in terms of wanting to delete and of 'knowing' why it should be deleted. Peridon (talk) 12:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Some editors have expressed their views on Talk:Zhang Haijie recently. Please take a look. _LDS (talk) 04:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.