Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhao Wei (gangster)

Zhao Wei (gangster)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep by unanimous !vote and WP:GNG satisfaction. (non-admin closure) Vaticidalprophet (talk) 03:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject of the article is probably quite famous but definitely isn’t notable. He is an alleged criminal who fails to satisfy either WP:CRIME nor does he possess in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources that satisfies WP:GNG. A close observation of the sources used and following a before search shows events linked to the subject are discussed but the subject per se isn’t discussed with WP:INDEPTH WP:SIGCOV, in summary this falls below our notability threshold. Celestina007 (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep I have added sources that describes the subject in detail, which was EIA report and . Zhao Wei is known not only on one event but multiple events (not just Ban Mom port but wildlife trafficking which I will add to the article sooner), and these sources suggest that.  Mario  Jump  83!  13:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per MarioJump83. I think it with the coverage it probably a keep. It satisfies WP:BASIC and GNG. VocalIndia (talk) 17:06, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with above. HAs enough coverage. Peter303x (talk) 02:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.