Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhavric


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:50, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Zhavric
I'll use the PROD summary that User:Wwwwolf had used, it sums things up really well: "A "slang term" that gets me whole 26 google hits, barring repeats. Quasi-nonsensical, original research, you name it." Metros232 15:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as a protologism. --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 16:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. NawlinWiki 16:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not widespread enough to be worthwhile. - Richardcavell 00:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per my original prod. Also, the commentary on the talk page makes me suspect that this could be a sneaky and vague parody of some sort, or even a subtle attack (too ridiculous if it's that, though)... and then these folks cite urbandictionary as the Seal of Notability. Meh. All in all, WP:NFT. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 00:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not nearly notable or widespread enough to have an article --Wafulz 15:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also, no source citations or other references to anything meeting the reliable source guidelines; all external links are to Internet forums, the Urban Dictionary, etc. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:16, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.