Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhibek Nukeeva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  J 947(c) (m) 19:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Zhibek Nukeeva

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: as non-notable beauty pageant winner. Tragic death also does not confer notability. Quis separabit? 11:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Notability is not conferred. Unscintillating (talk) 01:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:01, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:01, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep This AfD can't delete this topic from the encyclopedia, so the claim that the topic is non-notable is at most, as per WP:Deletion policy, a topic for discussion on the talk page or if necessary at RfC.  Were there any evidence to support the argument, a wrong venue result might be considered, but no evidence is provided.  Unscintillating (talk) 01:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: Beauty pageants are not my specialised topic, but I'd have thought winner of a national title qualified as notable with or without death. Certainly mustn't be deleted, at the least a redirect to Miss Kyrgyzstan needs to remain. Pam  D  13:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: National-level pageant winner alone meets GNG, additional newsworthy events, if tragic, also establish notability.   Montanabw (talk) 19:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Miss Kyrgyzstan where the subject is mentioned, per prior outcomes. No encyclopedically relevant prose and insufficient sources. Stating that the subject is notable / meets GNG without providing sources are not valid arguments in a deletion discussion. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep meets GNG. Yet another unnecessary nomination of a pageant winner. gidonb (talk) 02:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.