Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhonghua Primary School (Singapore)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete, redirect, and protect. If we're going to. protect the redirect it doesn't make all that much difference if it is deleted or not. Since there is also a desire to send a message, deletion seems appropriate. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:37, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Zhonghua Primary School (Singapore)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete Notability has not been established in accordance with WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Recommend deletion due to lack of notability established through significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Article previously redirected, in accordance with common AFD outcomes, yet followed by the creator reinstating the article, so I'm bringing it here for community consensus. Best regards,  Cind.   amuse  (Cindy) 09:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 12:47, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 12:47, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and then redirect to List of schools in Singapore. No sources have been provided other than the school's official site and Facebook. By the way, I notice that there are over 70 schools in Category:Primary schools in Singapore, which seems unusual given that most primary schools are usually considered non-notable. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect. What Metro said.  And ... it might make sense for someone to do a complete sweep of primary schools and AfD those that should be AfD'd (I've AfD'd a number today).--Epeefleche (talk) 07:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirects do not  necessarily require physical  deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Generally, no. However, the article creator refuses to honor the redirect, continually removing it to restore the article. That's why it was brought here to discuss deletion and then redirecting, as appropriate. Best regards,  Cind.   amuse  (Cindy) 11:46, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks Cindy, I missed that. See below.


 * Redirect to  article about  school  district or locality according  to  established procedure for non -notable primary/elementary/middle schools. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Additional comment: Delete the article before creating redirect and Full-protect  the redirect  page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * NOTE to closer. If this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to  include the  template on  the redirect  page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect per standard practice. Carrite (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 'Redirect and protect; we have sometimes deleted articles altogether when people prevent a neutral article or a redirect from being written, but there are almost always better ways to deal with the problem.  DGG ( talk ) 21:24, 26 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.