Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhu Taiqi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Zhu Taiqi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm sorry, but writing study guides (which is what his works appear to be) doesn't make you notable by itself, in my opinion, and I don't see anything else that makes him notable. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 15:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WikiPuppies  bark dig 00:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I found nothing covering him on google books or news archives in English or even searching the Chinese characters (with google translation help). I do not think he passes WP:BASIC or WP:AUTHOR. Hoppingalong (talk) 02:57, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete--SNOW - Per WP:SNOW No Notability. This Article has been flagged as an orphan since the year 2007.  Nothing has been done to meaningfully develop this article since it was created.  It appears that there aren't any reliable sources with information that could be included.OfficeGirl (talk) 23:32, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.