Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhu Xiaodong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Zhu Xiaodong

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article, then named "Zhu Xiao Dong," was previously nominated (not by me, who was at that time unaware of it) in 2008 for deletion, and the result of the discussion was "keep" (with only two people expressing opinion at that time). However, I still don't believe that notability was shown; the argument for notability was largely due to a single newspaper interview. The article was created by an editor who has made no other edits. There is no Chinese Wikipedia article. I don't see where the notability is. Delete. Nlu (talk) 16:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Further comment. It should be noted that the entries that come up during Google Scholar search are to what appears to be a completely different person: an economics professor at the University of Toronto.  --Nlu (talk) 16:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Source (singular) does not establish notability. It did however, introduce me to the translated phrase "Cooking cow horse masticate skin blending" for which I am thankful. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 22:30, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete He's of Chinese persuasion. And I mean that in the most respectful way possible.  173.21.39.80 (talk) 01:42, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – The subject fails WP:BASIC requirements of substantial coverage; he's not notable as an WP:ACADEMIC, either. JFHJr (㊟) 02:07, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete While I'm sure he is a fine surgeon, there is no evidence that he meets WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC. BTW I have NO idea what user 173.21.39.80's "argument" above is supposed to mean. --MelanieN (talk) 01:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking independent coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.