Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziauddin Ahmed (Joy)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 20:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Ziauddin Ahmed (Joy)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any notability. Earlier PrROD removed by an editor that appears to be a sock of the author, but without improving notability. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 09:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't see any notability whatsoever. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No obvious notability. Jake Brockman (talk) 18:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 15:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 15:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Cann't find reliable sources.Fails WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable at all. Altaf  ( talk )  23:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete being a student government official at a university is not a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - totally run of the mill, literally one of hundreds of thousands of people who have run a student government. So what? Bearian (talk) 04:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Civil Servant who studied in Australia is not enough to merit an article.  Jupitus Smart  14:47, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.