Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zielony Gaj, Mrągowo County


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  17:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Zielony Gaj, Mrągowo County

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-existent "village" article created by Kotbot, a bot operated by Kotniski.

There is no village, or place of any kind, with this name listed in Mrągowo. The location given in the article is simply an empty field.

On the same day Kotbot generated this article, it generated 1,254 other articles.

Fails WP:V, WP:GEOLAND, WP:NOTAHOAX. FOARP (talk) 15:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland. FOARP (talk) 15:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The place described is Zielony Lasek, but there's nothing to merge and this would not be a useful redirect as it's the wrong county (probably because the coordinates in the source lacked precision and put it the wrong side of the boundary). Peter James (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Peter James. I tried looking it up and thought it existed, only to find, as above, that the place is Zielony Lasek. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article cites pl:TERYT as a source, but there is no such place in Teryt, which only links Zielony Gaj, Giżycko County and Zielony Gaj, Sokółka County. We cannot accuse mass-work bots of creating HOAXes, so I guess we can chalk it up to some data error... (not the first non-existent location we would have an article for, oh, 15 years...). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree that this is not an intentional hoax, but the effect is ultimately the same. FOARP (talk) 09:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.