Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zikula (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Zikula
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This article have not any reliable source therefore I don't think it is notable. –ebraminiotalk 07:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 15:50, 13 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 15:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep: interestingly, while not being different enough from the rest of them, this particular framework received quite a lot of mention: (by WebmasterPro), Powering Websites with Zikula (by PCQuest),  (by Pro-Linux) and  (by German "PC Magazin", which seems to be unrelated to PC Magazine). While I'm not particularly convinced with these sources (at least PC Quests offers advertisement services masked as normal content), I'd give this article a benefit of doubt. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 15:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 00:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:28, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.