Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zilog head


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. WP:CSD hoax/vandalism; also WP:NEO JohnCD (talk) 14:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Zilog head

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable WP:NEOLOGISM. contested prod noq (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - non-notable neologism, as the nominator says. Wiktionary would be a better place to put this, were it a notable term I've seen all I need to from the article creator and his poor attempt at a sock-puppet. Still fails all inclusion criteria; speedy delete. KaySL (talk) 15:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Nomination. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 15:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I PROD tagged it for lack of notability, so not surprisingly I agree with the nominator's rationale. --bonadea contributions talk 16:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 18:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a malicious protologism per WP:NEO, WP:NFT, and WP:CSD - Even before registering on Wikipedia as GEORGIEGIBBONS, the article's creator has been trying to spread misinformation on Wikipedia using a number of British IPs, mostly about game engines. The user has also tried to do the same on the Sega forums and IGN boards using multiple accounts, and has been blocked several times on those sites as an abusive troll. As indicated by comments on the sites, noone else uses the term "Zilog head". Dancter (talk) 18:10, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep it - it is a strong memory of the Sega Forum peoples lifes! - Sketch Style —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.191.75 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep, it may become a notable reference to the forums but I will happily move it to a dictionary if required —Preceding unsigned comment added by GEORGIEGIBBONS (talk • contribs) 19:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * "may become a notable reference" is not a reason to keep it - it needs to be notable now. noq (talk) 19:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I as well as many others had been insulted by that term and it is something memorable therefore it is notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GEORGIEGIBBONS (talk • contribs) 19:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Not on Wikipedia - see WP:GNG. noq (talk) 20:28, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Type in Zilog head and press enter. - GEORGIEGIBBONS xxx —Preceding unsigned comment added by GEORGIEGIBBONS (talk • contribs) 21:24, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Burn with fire: Wikipedia is not a place for neologisms. Also, the sock/meatpuppeting campaign above only weakens the argument for keeping. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 00:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Dancter (talk) 03:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


 * It is being kept, end of story!!!, it MUST not be deleted and now this convo has gone too far! I have taken offence at the nomination and it will not be removed! —Preceding unsigned comment added by GEORGIEGIBBONS (talk • contribs) 13:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think sheer willpower alone is going to save this one, my friend. You spoke about wanting to make a new start on Wikipedia before; I'm afraid this kind of uncivil behaviour isn't helping you very much. KaySL (talk) 13:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:SCRABBLE. It may gain notability in the future as you have claimed, however Wikipedia can only cover topics which are notable now. Additionally reliable sources are required, and forum posts are not reliable. --Taelus (talk) 13:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete ASAP, that GEORGIEGIBBONS guy was spamming me with this insult on the IGN Boards as well as being an annoying next door neighbor who is stealing my IP address. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mykee881211 (talk • contribs) 13:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.