Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zimiti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 01:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Zimiti

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable technology. Googling only yields 382 hits and no news pages. Page reads like an advertisement; it was created by User:Zimiti, which seems to indicate a COI. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete a junk vanity article all about how it's innovative and whatnot... signed? Throw this out with the trash. JuJube (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete seems spam. The external links given as references (and read like press releases) all prominently mention that this is award winning technology. That's quite nice, but what award it actualy won is never cleared up. There are no other indications of notability. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:59, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - no reliable sources to indicate notability. Of the English language links  provided in the article, the business week link is dead, and the remainder are directory entries with information built from what reads like a press release. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - It's a non-notable company. Apparently it won an award, but what award was it actually given? Red  Zion X  —Preceding comment was added at 20:06, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete urgh.... vanity -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 23:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sounds familiar.  Maybe coincidence, but maybe similar to another article I've been involved in deleting:  possibly Wave systems or Gt xpress.  for "Wave Systems" I made the note "db-spam; page created twice; user deleted speedy-delete tag." By "user" here I'm pretty sure I would have meant the page creator. --Coppertwig (talk) 00:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - The technology is used in the Boardbug Baby and Child Monitor and Googlingproduces 6,300 references for this product. The technology received the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) Best of Innovations Award in 2005 CES 2005and the Smart Funding Innovation Award in the 2002/2003 Smart Awards 2002. - This article is still being edited and I propose it be kept and reviewed once the information is complete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zimiti (talk • contribs)
 * Reply Notability is not inherited. The links provided are for the Boardbug product and makes no mention of Zimiti. -- Whpq (talk) 17:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.