Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZincTech Dragon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-08 10:32Z 

ZincTech Dragon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable band. Google finds no relevant third-party sources. Moreover, the article has been solely edited by who claims to be Robert Wilson, the band leader. Pascal.Tesson 20:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * What dyu mean?? claims to be?? i am robert wilson. why would i lie about my name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rumandraisin (talk • contribs)
 * Delete for several reasons:
 * If Rumandraisin is the leader of the band, then he's got a conflict of interest. Somebody should tell him not to edit this article if it is kept, and not to re-create this article if it is deleted.
 * All of the "singles" are self-made by Rumandraisin. They look like somebody made them in MS Paint. I don't think that they are valid.
 * Their website looks pathetic. I know that this isn't a basis for deletion, but look at all the spelling errors. Those give me the impression that this is simply a garage band, and we all know how Wikipedia feels about garage bands. Also, they only have 4 songs loaded on their website, which is the limit for free users. Looks like they aren't paying for their free hosting service.
 * The most important reason: Fails WP:BAND. I tried to find the chart claims on somewhere other than the band's website, but I couldn't find them. My guess is that they were fabricated to make the band look better than it is. PTO 22:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, Rumandraisin has confirmed that he's part of the band . Pascal.Tesson 22:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Then refer to my first point: WP:COI. PTO 01:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * all of our singles were download only, anyway, i dont see how it matters. this page isnt doing anyone any harm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rumandraisin (talk • contribs)
 * Comment if that is the case, the claimed UK Chart positions are false as until 2007 download only did not qualify for the charts. Nuttah68 15:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete As Pascal.Tesson has demonstrated, this band is clearly nn. Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  23:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "Every date was cancelled due to foresight of low ticket sales." That's not exactly comforting.  No reference available for chart positions, no references provided at all.  Simply put, fails WP:BAND.  ShadowHalo 03:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no notability demonstrated or sourced. Nuttah68 15:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.