Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zinsmeistering


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete as attack page. RasputinAXP  c  15:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Zinsmeistering
Neologism, no Google results. Enough said. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Google has its limits:
 * Check the Washington Post's recent editorial using the word "Zinmeister"
 * http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002610767

Newly discovered political tactics will, necessarily, involve new words, e.g. Coingate

rewinn 01:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)rewinn
 * The site you linked to has no reference to the word "Zinsmeistering"... -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Still a non-notable neologism. -- Kicking222 01:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. --Ter e nce Ong 03:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * | This story in Editor&Publisher mentions the neologism, but cites Wikipedia as a basis. Talk about bootstrapping! Too cool a precedent not to set.
 * "Page does not exist" Vizjim 10:26, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. --Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  05:53, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A6 attack page and per all above. Paddles TC 06:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I know an 8-year-old who makes up words, too.  I'm not putting him on Wikipedia either.  Tychocat 08:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, attack page. Vizjim 10:26, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.