Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zipeg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 06:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Zipeg

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I tagged this for a speedy delete, but it was declined by an administrator. It looks like spam to me, with no assertion of notability. Cap'n Walker 19:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Week Keep. I think we really need an active Notability (software) guideline. But since there isn't one, I'll say keep since there seem to be plenty of reviews and CNET lists 16,000+ downloads in about three weeks. Not blatant advertising, though it could use a little rewording.  Citi Cat   ♫  20:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

The Unarchiver article, 7-zip article should also be deleted then?. Zipeg is completely free, not a spam, and has a par download counter for the last year with The Unarchiver. Leo Kuznetsov —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo.Kuznetsov (talk • contribs) 20:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.   --Gavin Collins 09:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as has no primary or secondary sources; article is no more than a spammy link to vendor's website. --Gavin Collins 09:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 11:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. The program is freeware so it's not commercial advertising/spam. Dougie WII 11:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Spam is spam, whether it's a free product or not. You can advertise for anything. -- 68.156.149.62 15:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per WP:SOFTWARE. Stifle (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.