Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zira

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep 4 / Delete 2 / Merge 3: No clear consensus, kept. -- AllyUnion (talk) 00:59, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Zira
The movie itself does not have a page, so why should a page about a minor character from it? Taking up space. --Woohookitty 02:14, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Neutral - The movie does have a page, the internal link was wrong. There are also pages on other characters from the Lion King movies--nixie 02:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - I linked the Lion King II page back to Zira. Still needs to be wikified. --Woohookitty 02:56, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, minor fictious character, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 03:25, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article can be fixed, minor character or not, still contains useful information.Cerceole| (talk) 03:27, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This character isn't notable on its own, the movie page is good enough for it. And this article is not only unencyclopedic, it's also annoying as a big spoiler (it tells every detail of the movie). I don't think this could grow to become a nice article. And the movie article already contains a nice, non-annoying plot summary. JoaoRicardo 05:07, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Anything that needs tp be said can be said in the movie's article. Unnecessary and poorly written breakout. -R. fiend 05:58, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, or merge/redir to movie article, which could use some expansion. Niteowlneils 17:46, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, strong cleanup. Contains useful information about a character in a notable enough film (though I never watched it). Strong cleanup because it's hard to read, weak keep because it's about a minor character. --Deathphoenix 02:57, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into the page of the film. Fictional characters shouldn't have their own pages unless they have gained considerable independent cultural significance. Martg76 17:22, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into the page of the film. The character by herself is a minor character and therefore isn't notable. --Idont Havaname 01:45, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with the film page, this is a lot of pointless info for a minor character. -- Krinberry 17:27, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)