Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zishan Engineers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 07:21, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Zishan Engineers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously speedy deleted page and nominated again for speedy deletion. Although I don't think it would be speedy deletion candidate, I see clear problems with notability and I think it should be deleted through AfD procedure. Beagel (talk) 15:32, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 16:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * comment Is there any indication of notable projects they worked on? If not Id agree that they are probably not notable enough for an article. Ill do a quick check myself Ottawa4ever (talk) 01:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Doesnt seem to be any notable projects i can recognise http://www.zishanengineers.com/projects.htm, They do have a few international jobs as well as numerous projects on the go, looking furtherOttawa4ever (talk) 02:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak delete after reading Notability and doing a quick check on the web, I can find primary sources establishing interantional nobility in their projects, but aside from job postings and business directories I cant find anything (yet) to suggest notability in secondary sources Ottawa4ever (talk) 02:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:00, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Insufficient notability per guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * quick check did not provide enough notability to be listed in en.wiki. weak delete Neozoon 20:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * just a further comment I was able to track down another source that mentions it as a partner to another firm. I dont know if this is eaxactly a secondary source but it may allow some indication that this article could be saved. Ill post in the articles discussion page Ottawa4ever (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 05:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.