Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zita Cabello-Barrueto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. It looks like adequate sources have been located. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Zita Cabello-Barrueto

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Delete: as non-notable academic. Mostly POV. Fails GNG, SIGCOV, etc. Nirva20 (talk) 05:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * REDIRECT to either Center for Justice and Accountability or Caravan of Death for reasons cited in colloquy below with @Goldsztajn. The subject (Cabello-Barrueto)'s notability derives almost entirely as a plaintiff in lawsuit (Cabello Barrueto v. Fernández Larios, 291 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (S.D. Fla. 2003)) -- not as an academic or author. Apologies for any inconvenience. Nirva20 (talk) 17:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Delete: agreed; non-notable, unsourced — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oort1 (talk • contribs) 07:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Actors and filmmakers, Women, Politics, Chile,  and California.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  06:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep AfD is not cleanup. Multi-year indepth coverage of Zita Cabello-Barrueto, especially noted as the leading plaintiff in Cabello Barrueto v. Fernandez Larios. Some examples: Quest for justice spans decades pt 1, Sister's quest for justice spans decades pt 2, Chilean's survivors sue Dade businessman, Chile verdict cheers sister in Bay Area / Jury orders payment in 1973 coup slaying, The Pinochet Effect: Transnational Justice in the Age of Human Rights pp165-166, Hermana de asesinado por Caravana de la Muerte, lanza un libro contando los hechos. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Goldsztajn -- The article as it exists is blatant (and outdated by decades) POV/OR: "She strongly opposes George W. Bush's stance against John McCain's anti-torture bill; Bush objects to the bill because it does not exempt the CIA. Her disdain for torture comes from her personal experience under Chile's CIA-initiated coup d'état". I don't know if the lawsuit itself is sufficient to establish notability. If so, then maybe the article should be the lawsuit not Cabello-Barrueto, whose extensive bibliography is here. Nirva20 (talk) 12:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * An article's lack of neutrality is not per se grounds for deletion. I don't see what the link has do with Cabello-Barrueto's bibliography; it's a publisher's blurb for a book she wrote. I've just linked five reliable sources, from multiple years, which contain significant coverage of the subject. This satisfies the WP:GNG/WP:BIO; if you wish to maintain an argument for deletion, you need to address why these sources do not establish Cabello-Barrueto's notability. FWIW, apologies if you are already aware of this, but if not, please have a read of WP:BEFORE. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 17:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * We all make mistakes. I did a Google search but found nothing impressive. maybe because all the links are in Spanish. That's on me. But Cabello-Barrueto is not notable as an academic or as an author only as a plaintiff, by your own words. The article should be redirected to the lawsuit you cited. Nirva20 (talk) 17:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The articles linked contain SIGCOV of the person, this means she satisfies the WP:GNG. I did not say she's only notable as a plaintiff ("especially noted" were my words), but even if I did, that is irrelevant. We assess the content of sources, we question the reliability of sources, we examine the relevance of sources, but we do not get to choose *why* a subject is notable, the sources determine notability for us. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep but neutralise per Gold Bedivere (talk) 14:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per Goldsztajn. Meets WP:NPROF. 2A01:799:2E3:C500:556:815E:86C2:7DB1 (talk) 15:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify Very poorly sourced BLP, keep otherwise. She is notable as an author, though. Either needs additional citations or a quick trip to draft space to clean up for mainspace, but the topic is notable. SportingFlyer  T · C  19:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I've cleaned it up. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 07:26, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per Goldsztajn.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.