Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zivit Inbar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 20:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Zivit Inbar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unreliable information. No RS. Fails the GNG. gidonb (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Israel,  and Australia. gidonb (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete orphan article that looks like a CV. WP:NOTRESUME. LibStar (talk) 23:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability, this is just promotional. Fails WP:GNG among other notability cirteria, and WP:NOTCV. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: PROMO with no sources outside of PR items or lists. Even my searches only turn up PR items. Oaktree b (talk) 23:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Businesspeople, Women,  and Israel.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  02:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I searched for reliable sources and found no evidence of notability. Marokwitz (talk) 15:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: per norm Robertjamal12   ~🔔  16:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: Looks just like a CV, clearly intended as promotional. -- D'n'B-t -- 18:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is WP:NOTLINKEDIN. Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: not notable. TarnishedPathtalk 08:43, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing notable about the topic. Chekidalum (talk) 11:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Strong delete: promotional material without any evidence of WP:GNG. Contributor892z (talk) 17:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. It doesn't appear to be promotional - I don't see an obvious connection to the creator. I am, however, confused why anyone would create an article about a small business owner who has no substantial legacy and has not garnered any coverage in reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 17:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.