Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zocdoc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  05:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Zocdoc

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NCORP. References are churnalism and run-of-the-mill business news.  scope_creep Talk  08:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:49, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: Well known medical scheduling company and satisfies WP:NCORP. Bretalins (talk) 20:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked for spamming, likely WP:UPE. MER-C 15:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 09:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.    </li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> </ol> There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow ZocDoc to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 08:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)</li></ul>
 * Keep Gets coverage, valued at over a billion dollars, obviously reliable sources that cover businesses will cover this.  D r e a m Focus  16:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep meets GNG with significant coverage spanning ten years from NYT, WaPo (from Cunard's list above), CNN, CNBC, PC World (in the article), among many others cited here and in the article. Also it's a billion-dollar company with millions of customers in thousands of cities. If we're going to have articles about companies, any company, then this is one that we should have an article about. Lev¡vich 16:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Rewritten to remove hatnotes. Sourcing demonstrates notability. Thanks  for finding more sources and formatting them for me. <b style="color:#7F007F">TimTempleton</b> <sup style="color:#800080">(talk)  <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  02:01, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Although not all of the references listed by Cunard above meet the criteria for establishing notability (for example the WSJ valuation article fails as does the NYT blog post) there are several that meet the criteria. Topic passes GNG/NCORP. <b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>++ 15:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * To make it easier for others, would you mind saying which references are good and made you vote keep here? --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Snowball keep per WP:GNG at the very least. This article should not have been nominated for deletion. gidonb (talk) 14:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Snow keep. Really, a two billion dollar company not notable? Apart from the sources listed by CUNARD, there are lots of others, and even a cursory GBooks search, for example, produces examples of in-depth coverage such as these . Satisfies WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Nsk92 (talk) 23:22, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.