Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZodTTD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 00:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

ZodTTD

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable developer. Testing notability. Computerjoe 's talk 12:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * He is one of the most notable developers in the iPhone community. I don't see why ZodTTD is being nominated for deletion while a biography for a polish actress who has acted in two movies is allowed to stay on. Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 21:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * He is defiantly notable, he is one of the most popular iPhone and iPod Touch hackers around, the article needs a little neutrality and it will be fine, no need to delete. --Spazturtle (talk) 17:08, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per discussion above. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, WP:IKNOWIT and now WP:PERNOM. A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. None of the sources on the article's page satisfy WP:GNG. Neither does the discussion above. — Rankiri (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually they are quite reliable, see below. Pcap ping  08:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Werner Heisenberg is sockpuppet of a banned user. Pcap ping  08:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  08:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Mentioned in multiple reliable sources like USA Today, and has a full interview in Wired (magazine). The article could use some work, but WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a valid reason to delete. Pcap ping  08:28, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Wired interview with him: . Samboy (talk) 08:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Pohta ce-am pohtit and Samboy. LotLE × talk  09:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, although I do believe some sort of rewrite would need to be done. Sorafune   +1  19:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.