Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoe Levin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. czar ⨹   05:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Zoe Levin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be WP:TOOSOON. red dogsix (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk to me  02:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk to me  02:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: Having reviewed WP:NYA, it appears the article passes. I have also added a few better sources from popular news agencies. EoRdE6 (talk) 03:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per what EoRdE6 said. 2600:1004:B05B:A4EF:0:17:168C:F101 (talk) 03:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Probable sock of User:EoRdE6.--Bbb23 (talk) 06:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Notability is out there - I've also removed all the IMDb crap . – Davey 2010  •  (talk)  04:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - All the sources I've come across are blogs which isn't brilliant - So other than blogs I can't find any shred of notability. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  04:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * But the fact that there are articles about her on large popular websites is enough to be notable like you said . Also its nominated for WP:TOOSOON not as much notability EoRdE6 (talk) 04:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Blogs aren't reliable sources, I'm fully aware of the noms reason.....– Davey 2010 •  (talk)  05:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 4 and 5 are not blogs don't know where you get that impression from EoRdE6 (talk) 05:08, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I think we're both getting confused here ..... Most search results are blogs ....The 2 above are clearly not but that's like out of 200 results... – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  05:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * , did you see the below responses? czar ⨹   05:02, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * - Nope but thanks for pinging :) - KEEP per sources found below. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  05:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not even begin to pass WP:N, WP:GNG, or WP:ENT. Softlavender (talk) 07:11, 24 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. OK, I am finding a sizable amount of dedicated and extensive coverage in a number of reliable sources. It's just that this article doesn't mention or reflect that at all and seems to have been written by someone less than competent, and the article does not assert any kind of recognizable notability. It's also true that the article creator has been edit warring over non-WP:RS citations, etc. I don't know whether to !vote Delete with no prejudice for someone else creating a decent article with the actual RS interview coverage she has received, or just leave this article standing and wait for someone else to add the RS coverage. Softlavender (talk) 07:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - The WP:TOONSOON train already left the station when Levin became one of the leads of a national hit television show. Also there's enough in-depth coverage by secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.  --Oakshade (talk) 16:05, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - I find Oakshade's argument and sources compelling, and refute the WP:TOOSOON argument.--Theredproject (talk) 22:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.