Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoecracy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Zoecracy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This appears to be made-up; either original research, or possibly a hoax. The two references stated are available online, and neither mentions 'zoe' -. To avoid deletion, demonstrate notability, through reliable sources. (Contested PROD by User:Chzz) Schuhpuppe (talk) 10:17, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: I see the sources but I couldn't any evidence that this term is actually mentioned there, at least it doesn't appear to be a major topic, else mentionings of the term could be found elsewhere. I guess the editor just added these references to pretend the term originates there and is not made up. --Schuhpuppe (talk) 10:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:ONEDAY; it describes and justifies a novel procedure for passing legislation that has to do with the environment; no sources beyond the importance of the environment in general. Google is convinced that I must be searching for "seocracy," "zoecrack," or "zoecrazy" (the last two are usernames); the only hits for zoecracy are Wikipedia or derived from it. The prod for this article was removed by the page's creator without giving a reason and the "references" section renamed to "further reading" (which would explain why the term does not appear in those books).   RJC  TalkContribs 16:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, reliable or otherwise. No proof of existence, let alone notability. Edward321 (talk) 04:00, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.