Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zohar Manna (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. H e rmione1980 01:01, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Zohar Manna
This page surivied vfd back in April but only got 4 votes 2 Del and 2 Keep and this page havent expanded since. Looks like a nn professor. Delete --Aranda56 02:09, 25 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, he seems pretty well established... maybe an ego but definitely on par with many other articles we have here. gren グレン 02:28, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd say Keep and expand if possible. Google search gives 63,400 hits . I can't say they all correspond to him, but at least the first 10 pages of results do in full. Shauri 02:31, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. He is the author of a textbook from a major press and reprinted by another major press, which has been established by consensus as sufficient notability for academics in other cases. I've added book info. Chick Bowen 03:26, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep adeqautely notable Dlyons493 03:29, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep His work seems to have been translated into several other languages, seems notable. --best, kevin  · · · Kzollman | Talk · · · 06:35, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and EXPAND lots of googles, medium-notable author. Ryan Norton T 17:05, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I also agree that this one needs to be expanded. --Keyfinder
 * Keep and allow for organic growth. Klonimus 21:28, 30 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.