Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoids - the OAR


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:25, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Zoids - the OAR

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nothing indicates why this specific line of Zoids needs a separate article. Notability is not established, and the content is already covered within the main article. TTN (talk) 18:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Which sounds like a reason to redirect to the main article as none exists to redlink... Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 17:33, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete or Merge There is nothing to indicate exceptional notability of this line of products to warrant it's own article. The original Zoids article could benefit from having some of the additional information within this rogue article, however I must vote to delete. Aramova (talk) 00:55, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:V; no reliable sources even say this was the name of this line of toys. Abductive  (reasoning) 01:40, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.