Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombadings 1: Patayin sa Shokot si Remington


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Zombadings 1: Patayin sa Shokot si Remington

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Film with questionable notability, see also: Articles for deletion/Hari Ng Sablay Wgolf (talk) 20:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per this Variety review. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 02:12, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Definite Keep per more of the sources provided below. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 17:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  15:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  15:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. More reviews:  from The New York Times,  from The Hollywood Reporter,  from the Los Angeles Times, and  from The Village Voice. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep per easily meeting WP:NF. Sorry, but you really need to use a touch of due diligence when making your determinations, as notability is not based upon sources being used, but upon their being available. It took me only seconds to find coverage in multiple reliable sources. We improve weak articles as possible, not delete them because it has not yet been done.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.