Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombeavers 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is absolutely a hoax, at least in this version of the article as it was created by a sockpuppet (User:Aron&April654321 and User:AnthonyFernando5, who are basically the same person) that is notorious for creating these articles. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Zombeavers 2

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a likely hoax. Besides the fact that there are no hits for this, the creator has apparently inserted himself into several articles as the director of unannounced sequels, which are also likely hoaxes. Google searches for confirmation turn up nothing but fanfic and wikia profiles. Could probably be speedy deleted as G3, but I'm not sure it's blatant enough to qualify. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  14:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as a obvious hoax, Found nothing on Google to verify its existence. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:18, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as unreferenced, poorly written, likely hoax. My Google search also failed to find any reliable source coverage. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  17:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per being at the most polite WAY TOO SOON. I found a source telling us "...don’t forget to stay through the end credits. There’s a hint to a possible sequel waiting for you which can’t be called Zombeavers 2, but doesn’t really need too much of a title change" and there's also WP:RS British newspaper Metro saying "Expect to see Zombeavers 2: Dam You To Hell in the pipeline soon."  So the topic is a possibility.... however, NONE of this article's purported cast or crew are searchable, when lends credence to this article being a hoax version of a topic that might exist in the future. If a real film actually becomes sourcable, then I'd have not prejudice against a properly cited recreation.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 00:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Trinidad and Tobago-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm going to close this as a hoax. This is an article created by a sock of User:Aron&April654321 and this is pretty much in line with what they normally do: create hoax articles and list the same people in each one. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.