Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombie Carnaval


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 20:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Zombie Carnaval

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTABILITY, not covered by reliable sources. AdrianGamer (talk) 13:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 9 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete A quick news search brings up some sources of which it's the main topic, but I don't believe that there's significant coverage and thus it fails WP:GNG. Pishcal  — ♣ 14:19, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ugly stub, but there are several reviews from vetted video game sources including Gamezebo, Pocket Gamer, Slide to Play, 148Apps (and AppSpy), via Metacritic. Not a super strong case, but three reviews is usually the threshold, as there should be enough to write a decent article about the app. czar ⨹   15:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Eight reviews on Metacritic.  That basically means notability is assured.  Metacritic doesn't index blogs. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * That's true, but it's worth noting that Metacritic does index sites we consider less than reliable. The aforementioned sites are good, though. czar ⨹   13:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.