Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombie Ghost Train (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Zombie Ghost Train
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

no real claim to notability, albums not on important label, touring lacks coverage, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. nothing satisfying wp:music. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * comment: I did a quick search - it's possible they meet wp:music #4 & #7 but I need to search more. they seem to have had some street press coverage in brisbane & sydney & one article mentions they had coverage overseas whilst on tour so will try find some of these & see if they are reliable sources. it does seem a niche music style, so might be #7 if we can find more notable info about psycobilly - perhaps a 4th wave? will vote later after more research (would hate to vote to delete it just because I'm not familiar with this genre & not searching in the right places) Kathodonnell (talk) 18:56, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * keep - ok, voting keep. I think it meets WP:MUSIC #5 important indie label - the two albums were released on German label Fiend Force Records (which has a WP on german WP - not sure how to link to that internally). I translated the german page and the label sounds notable as an indie label. also the second label was released on Resist Records in Aus - they have a WP page too (though it is very sparse). the EP was also on a German label which seems notable. I've added some references & details to the article. they have been featured in some horrorpunk magazines/video-mags, and street press, and there was some info about the Australian, European and USA tours- not sure if it's enough to meet WP:MUSIC #4 also. the article still needs some work, but I think it's been improved a little. Kathodonnell (talk) 16:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Jenks24 (talk) 08:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep – per Kathodonnell: notablility is now established and verified by RS.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.