Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombie Town


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Zombie Town

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:MOVIE. No evidence of widespread distribution, no reviews, no awards or otherwise. In addition, none of the individuals or companies involved in the film are notable, nor does this film does not seem to have any sort of cult following. The IMDB profile is essentially empty, and searching for news (let alone reviews) turns up nothing. It looks entertaining, but sadly that's not allowable as a criteria for inclusion. jonny - m t  05:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 01:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- --  pb30 < talk > 17:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, there are reviews on specialized sites such as, and .--Tikiwont (talk) 11:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  BLACK KITE  01:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Agree with nom in that no reviews etc = no notability Corpx (talk) 08:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Considering that none of the actors producers or director have Wikipedia pages (except Jason Smiley who's notability is also contested).--The Dominator (talk) 23:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

http://www.mtihomevideo.com/mti/Zombie%20Town.htm
 * Not a registered user, but the original writer is wrong to say the film received no widespread distribution. It was released on DVD by MTI Home Video:

Per the page above, it was scheduled for release in November, but I only got my review copy through this week, so may have been delayed. For the moment, it seems eminently qualified for inclusion here. Of course, my opinion might change after I've watched it. :-) Jim - TrashCity.org —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.231.82.213 (talk) 03:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.