Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoopsia

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was ambiguous.

The current content is a mere dictionary definition which has already been successfully transwiki'd to Wiktionary. It has remained unexpanded for the full discussion period and, in fact, for two months prior. The article is an orphan. In my experience, its orphan status drastically reduces the likelihood that the article will ever be expanded.

I am going to exercise my discretion to override the strict vote-count and delete this in accordance with my understanding of the transwiki process and WP:WIN. This deletion is without prejudice and should not be considered precedent for re-deletion if the article is re-created as an encyclopedia article (that is, more than a mere dictionary definition). Rossami (talk) 23:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Zoopsia
Delete. Dictionary definition already transwikied to Wiktionary. Limited encyclopedic scope. Physchim62 21:39, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with hallucination or keep. It seems to me that "limited encyclopedic scope" implies "some encyclopedic scope". Kappa 00:37, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge, real term. Grue 17:43, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
 * KEEP. it is legit. Kingturtle 19:52, 15 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.