Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoya Tsopei


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  02:17, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Zoya Tsopei

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, or WP:NMUSIC. No reliable sources added since this was last declined at AfC, and later re-Draftified. A thorough search for sources uncovers no reliable secondary sources - only paid promotions, unreliable blogs, and press releases. Politanvm talk 02:38, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians,  and Women. Politanvm  talk 02:38, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources found, a few hits on Bollywood sites. The link used in the article as a source, unsure if it meets RS criteria. Regardless, we don't have enough with which we can build an article. Oaktree b (talk) 02:49, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:GNG. Nothing indicates that she is notable enough to warrant an article. —C.Fred (talk) 03:11, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Further observation:, who created the article, also uploaded the infobox image, which was taken at a photo shoot, and they indicated that they took the image. This is strong circumstantial evidence that they have a conflict of interest with Tsopei. The fact that two of the references now cited in the article are dated 15 December—after the AfD started—also adds evidence. —C.Fred (talk) 12:52, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * FWIW: Commons CU here: is a confirmed sock of Marlia555786, whose other sock  had previously created this article.  Эlcobbola  talk 14:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV has only one reference [] Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 03:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Based on my comments above about the new sources dated today—which are both bylined to "Tedfuel"—it feels like the new sources are part of a calculated campaign to get an article up for the artist. Wikipedia is not a promotional platform. —C.Fred (talk) 12:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The socks seem to confirm that, they usually pop up when someone isn't quite notable. Oaktree b (talk) 14:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Greece and Latvia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:32, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - the new sources added all look suspect to me. Hardakesang looks egregious to me as it openly admits to being a digital marketing site. The entire article looks like paid-for spam. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:40, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, per deletion nomination. I note that an editor (likely related) tried to remove the deletion tag off of the article page a few minutes ago as well. Likely is paid-for spam or something to that effect. Carolina2k22 • (talk)  •  (edits)  02:27, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * keep, I am not linked to the person or article just found it on scrolling. but i think this article have enough links and sources to have wikipedia page. Moreover, we need to find more sources from google and add in this article instead of deletion. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tichkun786 (talk • contribs) 02:32, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Sock !vote striken. Эlcobbola  talk 17:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.