Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zumbly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Zumbly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Inadequate references for notability. The Maxim article is a laudatory publicity write up of the founder; the Forbes article is a general one mainly devoted to other firms with one paragraph on this one.  DGG ( talk ) 06:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 07:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unremarkable software. This article is likely undisclosed paid advertising, which I have blocked the creator for. MER-C 14:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.