Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zwick Roell Group (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 09:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Zwick Roell Group
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Appears to fail WP:CORP. Nothing new of any substance has materialized since last AFD discussion to indicate notability. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:29, 5 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Last AFD closed as keep four months ago.  Any reason consensus should have changed?--Milowent (talk) 20:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Whpq's 2 example sources in the last AfD ( and ), it appears that it does meet WP:CORP. Just because it isn't sourced doesn't mean it can't be reliably sourced. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is no need for anything new of any substance to have materialized since the last AFD discussion, because enough of substance alreadyt materialised there. If the nominator objects to the sources not being in the article then WP:SOFIXIT applies. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.