Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zwolnieni z Teorii


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 11:10, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Zwolnieni z Teorii

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable charity. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGCRIT and WP:ORGIND. Some coverage.  scope_creep Talk  10:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)


 * It isn't their work as a charity that should be notable here, they should be noted for their work as an institution and impact on polish educational system. The lack of legal framework in Poland, forces them to operate as a charity, but it really workes more like fund or a trust. I will attempt to rework the article and prove to you that it has a greater news coverage and a scope of activities that I covered in my stub. Sincerely Nadzik (talk) 13:35, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * What they're doing in Poland is neither here nor there, its is what is notable on Wikipedia that counts. The majority of the references are to the app or to the company profile pages and are non-notable, primary and not in-depth nor intellectually independent, or secondary sources. The rest are press-releases of one type or another.  scope_creep Talk  13:54, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I understand. As I said, I tried to rework the article, added several sources that aren't press-releases. I hope that they will meet the criteria as they are notable, primary and in depth (unfortunately they are mostly in polish). I hope that this will allow other editors to see that their actions are notable and should be included on Wikipedia. If you agree with me on that, but for example disagree onthe format, please tell me and in my free time I will try to bring it to the norms using your suggestions. Thanks!Nadzik (talk) 14:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Keep. The fact that sources are in Polish does not reduce their significance. Rathfelder (talk) 11:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Rathfelder, It wasn't the fact they were in Polish, they were translated as were the pages they pointed to and they don't add to up. I always check the references beforehand and always do the translation work. We can go through each one if need be.  scope_creep Talk  12:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I will see it has been significantly reworked with all the app stuff taken out. I'll check the ref's again per WP:HEY.   scope_creep Talk  12:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Well done. I have checked about 12 references and there is now some pretty decent secondary references. It is still full of non-rs much references, but it is provably notable. I will do a copy edit later. This can close as a keep. Nomination Withdrawn. scope_creep Talk  22:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Some reliable news coverage of their events/activities in Polish media: /, and / (lower quality as they seem like churnalism/rewrittem press releases). The media coverage (in Polish) seems borderline, but I am leaning to the notable side of the line in this case. (local edition of a reliable major newspaper) mentions this program in passing but calls it "well known". --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. The sources are in Polish because they are active in Poland. They are significant and are covered in Polish press. --MozeTak (talk) 19:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.