Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZyXEL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep and rewrite. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  22:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

ZyXEL
Seems more like an advertisement then anything else Missvain 05:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads as copy from the company's Annual Report - no claim to notability present in article, WP:CORP refers.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   05:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Rewrite They are a well-known company.     Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  12:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment, Keep ZyXEL is a fairly large international company. I've seen their products and coverage of them lots of times (I used to own one of their 56k modems actually!). It should be possible to find plenty of media coverage of the company. Should the article survive it, at least, needs a serious rewrite. It is an advert in its current form. Yahoo finance quote on Zyxel from the TAIEX. It seems to justify an article... badly needs a rewrite. - Motor (talk) 08:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but rewrite. Very notable company, but the current article is an advertisement. J I P  | Talk 17:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep and blow out the gunk. Company is notable, 'cause I heard of 'em.  But I defy you to tell me what "ZyXEL has transformed itself several times in response to changes in the rapidly evolving networking industry" means in English.  Smerdis of Tlön 18:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite to be more encyclopedic. &mdash; 199 19:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as advertisement. Tychocat 20:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Part of TAIEX index, so notable per WP:CORP Retropunk 07:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Rewrite Monni 20:39, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.