Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zygo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. ST47 Talk 11:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Zygo, Zygo Energy Vodka

 * - (View AfD) (View log)
 * Note; there are two separate articles being nominated:
 * Zygo - and - Zygo Energy Vodka   SkierRMH 23:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * del Nonnotable brand of vodka. Only 100 unique google hits. No independent references. `'mikka 22:07, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I didn't get it. It exists. What makes a vodka more notable. Consumption? Alcohol volume? The extent of negative effects on human brain?  Lajbi  Holla @ me  23:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Compare the external coverage of, for example, Skyy vodka with the external coverage of Zygo. I have no opinion as of now, but the whole third-party coverage thing would certainly be helpful. GassyGuy 00:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, independent refs are easy to find on Google. Here's two links that offer decent coverage:  It however seems to be one product and thus the articles should be merged. hateless 00:51, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep (but merge the product into the company article) I'm satisfied there is plenty of external coverage of this brand, for example: The New York Times, the Boston Phoenix, and over 9,600 Google hits. Plus, the nominator does not appear to have listed any rationale or reason for deletion. --Canley 08:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Apologies to the nominator, I thought your deletion rationale was one of the suggestions. There's no need to put "delete" in the reasoning, it's kind of assumed that is your suggestion. --Canley 05:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep and merge per Canley. Obviously notable and verifiable. Could certainly use cleanup, but why would we delete this? schi talk 23:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, if you are going to keep each and every brand of candies, bagels, pizzas, toys, then what the heck, keep it. Still, IMO it is garbage. `'mikka 17:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge the two, and rewrite to avoid the wording that makes it borderline advertising. Radagast83 22:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.