Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zyklon (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No consensus to delete and easily passes notability per WP:MUSIC. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy  ( talk ) 10:33, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Zyklon (band)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:MUSIC. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Could you please explain how? I see no problems with this article. = ∫tc 5th Eye 04:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep WTF!!!!! 3 albums on a notable label, interviews in notable magazines, and that was only going through the article for 10 seconds. I'm assuming this is a good faith nomination, and I'd ask the creator to withdraw the AfD nomination.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 04:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per clear pass of WP:Music . Vickser (talk) 05:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Article needs huge improvement, e.g. proper references to reliable sources (not fansites, EM, etc.). If this can be done, the article should be ok to stay - probably passes WP:MUSIC on releases, but very lacking in evidence of significant independent coverage.--Michig (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Very strong keep, easily passes WP:MUSIC with three albums on Candlelight. There is stacks of independent coverage in print-copy metal magazines such as Terrorizer, Zero Tolerance etc. References should be trivial to find. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.