Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/iGoodbye


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:17, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

iGoodbye

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable television series finale, But nothing that indicates notability. While iCarly is a notable children’s show from the late 2000s and early 2010s, the made-for-TV specials this series had do not deserve their own articles as they are better suited for the wikis on Fandom. Pahiy (talk) 00:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Pahiy (talk) 00:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Pahiy (talk) 00:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Pahiy (talk) 00:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep as it seems to be a notable episode with reviews in reliable sources saying it was the best episode and also passes WP:GNG with reliable sources reviews already in the article, in my view Atlantic306 (talk)
 * Redirect to iCarly (season 6), per Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television/Archive 8. WP:TV has had discussions on when episode articles should exist, and the general consensus is that reviews existing for an episode does not constitute sufficient grounds for establishing standalone articles on said episodes. A recent discussion on this exact same topic exists at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television. -- / Alex /21  02:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Do not consider that a non RFC discussion involving 7 project members is adequate to overrule WP:GNG which this passes imv, Atlantic306 (talk)
 * And that is your opinion, thank you for it. This is mine, and the discussion and resultant consensus has been used to redirect multiple failed episode articles in the past. Remember, GNG is only a guideline, not policy. Also, please sign your posts properly. -- / Alex /21  00:41, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BD2412  T 02:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per 's reason. Corachow (talk) 12:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Atlantic306. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.