Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/netceeing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. J I P | Talk 09:14, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Netceeing
Relates to "the posting on the web of rap lyrics". Has a "list of prominent persons" that includes several very insulting entries. —This unsigned comment was added by Alethiophile (talk • contribs).
 * Cleanup, there seems to be enough salvagable material there. Just strip away all the dumb vandalism and she'll be okay.  Lankiveil 11:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC).
 * Keep Considering content "insulting" is not a reason for deletion.
 * Delete Only returns 1930 hits on google the first of which is Wikipedia, so its still a neologism. Note that whether or not it is insulting is completely irrelevant. JoshuaZ 20:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. — Mar. 29, '06 [06:44] <[ freakofnurxture]|[ talk]>

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Johnleemk | Talk 14:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Delete as neologism still. (And yes, strongly agree that offensiveness is not a reason to delete). JoshuaZ 14:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This is a reiteration of a previous vote by JoshuaZ. --Hyperbole 21:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as neologism. --Ter e nce Ong 15:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but heavily cleanup. It's a neologism, sure, but Google seems to indicate that it's a notable one - netceeing is a real phenomenon.  Unfortunately, the original author of this page didn't seem at all interested in writing an article of encyclopedic quality.  --Hyperbole 21:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism with 226 unique hits. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism. A term requires a lot more Google hits before it should become notable. And I can't see anything in this article which indicates this is widespread. Fagstein 05:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, unverifiable, unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. Stifle 23:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.