Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/page=Greg Koukl (2nd nomination)

Greg Koukl
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability, warning has been in place for over 7 years. I cannot find sources to indicate notability has been attained since the last nomination in 2011, which was closed as no consensus. glman (talk) 18:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 9.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 19:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: Rather prolific author and is talked about a ton in the religious media, but a distinct lack of book reviews in "mainstream" media (for lack of a better word). This review in religious media is typical... Some scattered mentions here  or . We'd need more of these last two types of sources for this to have a chance to be notable here. Was hoping this would pass AUTHOR. Oaktree b (talk) 00:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Radio, Christianity, California,  and Illinois.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have added another reference which squeezes him over the line on WP:GNG. But the Google scholar citations are actually pretty good, including 98 for Tactics. StAnselm (talk) 23:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep as has good cites for two of his books as per Google Scholar here and coverage in reliable sources such as The Christian Post, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep:He's made STR. He's notable. Quote Veteran (talk) 18:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: Per above. ADifferentMan (talk) 07:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)