Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/starchamp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 09:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

StarChamp

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Keep no reason given to delete. The nominator seems to be a WP:SPA in opposition to Starchamp. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:21, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment The article gives no independent sources and doesn't even say what "StarChamp" is. If anyone knows anything about it please fix the article so we can have a decent discussion.  A Google search finds a lot of "StarChamp" but it's difficult to tell if it's related. Drawn Some (talk) 13:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. There appear to be more informative versions in the history.  I gather this is some kind of talent competition organized by a music school in Singapore.  No opinion at present as to the notability of this program. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That helps, but I'm still not sure if it is a record label, a school, a school program, a talent agency, etc. It is in some odd categories such as "Living people".  Drawn Some (talk) 14:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Despite the technicality of not giving a deletion reason, I have to go with a speedy delete on this one. It's clearly spam to me, but it doesn't really say what they advertise themselves as, other than to promote and encourage talent.  Maybe it's a talent agency....  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:04, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, blatant spam. - 2 ... says you, says me 19:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.