Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/unheard-before U.S. towns

To add to this deletion debate, click here


 * I vote to delete all small U.S. towns on the basis that they destroy the functionality of the Random link. 666 20:38, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * You'll have to list every single one you want deleted, but I don't think you want to do that. Keep all.RickK | Talk 20:44, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep all. Someone from one of these "unheard of" towns could come along and add some useful and intresting information about their town. Besides, what constitutes as "small"? 1,000? 10,000? 50,000? Rainier Schmidt 20:48, Mar 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * This request is inmpossible because, as Rainier says, you haven't specified what you mean by "small". If you said "all towns with less than 10 people" or "all towns with less than 100 people" or "all towns with less than 10,000 people" or whatever, then that would be a debatable suggestion (although I'd personally vote against it). Saul Taylor 22:10, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep - random page works fine for me -- Cyrius | Talk 22:16, Mar 28, 2004 (UTC)